Legal protections for de facto marriage and its dissolution
Legal protections for de facto marriage
- In Korea, under the principle of de juris marriage, couples are only recognized as legally married if they meet the substantive and formal requirements of marriage. Meanwhile, a de facto marriage is a continuation of married life that meets the substantive requirements of marriage, such as the meeting of the minds to marry, marriageable age, nonincestuous relations, and nonbigamy, but without the formal requirement of marriage reporting. Unlike de juris marriage, de facto marriages only enjoy some of the legal protections for spousal rights and obligations.
How to dissolve a de facto marriage
- Not being legally married, a couple dissolving their de facto marriage do not have to undergo legal processes such as a court’s confirmation of divorce, report of divorce, etc. Therefore, a de facto marriage may be dissolved by an agreement between the parties or by one party giving notice.
- Neither the agreement nor notice requires a predetermined form and may be done in any form, including oral communication, telephone, letter, etc.
Issues with property and children upon the dissolution of de facto marriage
Property issues
- Furthermore, it is held that property jointly amassed by the spouses during the duration of a de facto marriage is presumed to be co-owned by them, and division of property may be sought as when de juris married couples divorce, as part of the liquidation of spousal property on the dissolution of de facto marriage (
Supreme Court Judgment 94Meu1379,1386 announced on March 10, 1995).
Issues with children
- Children born of spouses in a de facto marriage are born out of wedlock. However, if the father admits paternity of a child, the spouses exercise joint custodial and fostering rights over such child; when the de facto marriage relationship is dissolved, the spouses decide by agreement on custodial rights, fostering person, and fostering matters. If they do not reach such an agreement, they may request a court make such a designation (Articles 837, 837-2, 843, 864-2, and 909(4) of the Civil Act).
- However, if paternity is not admitted, no legal parent-child relationship exists between the child born out of wedlock and the father, and no request to decide custodial rights, designation of fostering person, or fostering matters may be made against or by the father (husband). An action to admit paternity must first be brought to make such a request [Article 863 of the Civil Act; Article 2(1)1(b)(ix) of the Family Litigation Act].
※ Judicial precedent on whether a request to designate a fostering person, etc. against the biological father of a child born out of wedlock is permissible:
“There is no legal basis under current law to request a decision on fostering person designation or fostering matters for a child unless a party to the divorce or a party to a judgment for the annulment or cancelation of marriage requests it. Therefore, the biological mother of a child who was born in a de facto marriage or a temporary liaison may not make such a request against the child’s biological father.” (
Supreme Court Judgment 79Meu3 announced on May 8, 1979)