ENGLISH

Victim and Assailant Involved with Violence and Injury
Confining the Defendant
Indictment during Confinement
- “Indictment during confinement” refers to the prosecutor filing prosecution while the suspect has been confined. In this case, the defendant will stand trial while being arrested or confined in prison, etc.
Reason for Confinement
- The court may confine the defendant if there is a justifiable reason to suspect the defendant committing the crime, or if the defendant falls under any of the following cases.
· If the defendant has no proper residence
· If the defendant might destroy evidence
· If the defendant tries to escape or might try to escape
- When screening the reason for confinement, the court considers the crime’s gravity, risk of a second conviction, the risk of harm the victim and major testifiers may suffer (Article 70, paragraph 2 of the Criminal Procedure Act).
- For cases with a fine less than KRW 500,000 or punished with detention or penalties, the defendant may not be confined unless he/she does not have a proper residence (Article 70, paragraph 3 of the Criminal Procedure Act).
How to Confine the Defendant
- Issuance and Execution of Arrest Warrant
· The court shall issue an arrest warrant to confine the defendant (Article 73 of the Criminal Procedure Act).
· The judicial police official shall execute the arrest warrant as ordered by the prosecutor. However, the presiding judge, commissioned judge, or entrusted judge may order the arrest warrant execution if urgently required (Article 81, paragraph 1 of the Criminal Procedure Act).
※ According to the prosecutor’s order, the prison officer shall execute the arrest warrant issued to confine the defendant locked in jail or prison (Article 81, paragraph 3 of the Criminal Procedure Act).
· The person executing the warrant shall make sure to present the warrant and deliver its copy before executing the arrest warrant and quickly bring the defendant to the designated court or another designated place (Article 85(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act).
※ The person executing the arrest warrant may arrest the defendant if necessary, even without holding the arrest warrant. In this case, the person shall notify the defendant of the summarized prosecution information and the issuance of the arrest warrant before execution. After the execution, the person shall promptly present the arrest warrant and deliver its copy to the defendant (Article 85(3) and (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act).
· Unless the defendant has escaped, the person executing the arrest warrant shall notify the summarized crime information, reason for confinement, and the right to appoint an attorney before confining the defendant (Article 72 of the Criminal Procedure Act).
- Notification of Confinement, Etc.
· The person executing the arrest warrant shall provide a written notice on the case name, date and place of confinement, the summarized crime-related information, reason for confinement, and the purpose of the defendant being able to appoint an attorney. The person executing the arrest warrant shall notify this fact to the confined defendant’s attorney, if any. If an attorney has not been appointed, the person executing the warrant shall notify the person entitled to assign an attorney-at-law under Article 30, paragraph 2 of the Criminal Procedure Act, chosen by the defendant (Article 87 of the Criminal Procedure Act).
· The person executing the arrest warrant shall promptly inform the defendant of the prosecution information (Article 88 of the Criminal Procedure Act).
※ However, informing the defendant before confinement on the summarized prosecution information and the right to appoint an attorney is regulated under the post-hearing procedure. Therefore, violation of the above obligation does not affect the effectiveness of the arrest warrant (Supreme Court Decision No. 2000모134 Decided November 10, 2000).
- Period of Confinement
· In principle, the confinement period of the defendant is two months. However, if a particular reason requires prolonging the confinement period, the period may be renewed up to two times for two months, respectively, in each court trial. However, suppose there shall be an appellate instance inevitably due to the suspect or the suspect’s attorney applying inspection of evidence and documents requiring an additional trial. In this case, the confinement period may be renewed no more than three times (Article 92, paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Criminal Procedure Act).
· The confinement period shall not include the suspended period of trial proceedings or the period of arrestment, imprisonment, or confinement before filing the prosecution (Article 92, paragraph 3 of the Criminal Procedure Act).
Cancellation of the Confinement, Etc.
- There may be no reason for confinement, or the reason may be expired. In this case, the court may decide to cancel the confinement by its official authority or by the claim of the prosecutor, defendant, attorney, or the person entitled to appoint an attorney-at-law (Article 93 of the Criminal Procedure Act).
- If justifiable reasons exist, the court may suspend the execution of detention by placing the defendant under the supervision of relatives, a protection organization, or other suitable persons or by restricting the area of his/her dwelling after listening to the prosecutor’s opinion. However, the court may omit to ask the prosecutor’s opinion if the situation is urgent (Article 101, paragraphs 1 and 2of the Criminal Procedure Act).